A lot of people believe that if Sarnia Sting centre Alex Galchenyuk hadn’t missed most of the 2011-2012 season with a knee injury he’d be neck and neck with teammate Nail Yakupov as the top-ranked prospect going into the NHL Entry Draft in Pittsburgh.

After seeing Galchenyuk blaze through fitness testing at the NHL Combine, putting to rest any fears the knee is a problem, more than a few hockey people think he still belongs in the same sentence as the dynamic Yakupov. My guess is you can count the Edmonton Oilers among them.

While that shouldn’t be taken as meaning Oilers chief scout Stu MacGregor and his staff have Galchenyuk rated above or dead-even with Yakupov on their prospect list, you’ve got to think Edmonton’s brain trust is looking long and hard at the possibility of taking a pivot to complement 2011 first overall pick Ryan Nugent-Hopkins.

I’ve gone as far as to suggest the Oilers should swing for the fences and take Yakupov with the first overall pick and then do whatever it takes — short of moving Nugent-Hopkins, Taylor Hall or Jordan Eberle – to acquire another top-five pick and use it to select Galchenyuk. That, obviously, would take a lot of maneuvering by GM Steve Tambellini. Suffice to say, it’s a long shot, at best.

More than likely, then, it’s going to be an either-or situation with Yakupov and Galchenyuk when it comes to Tambellini’s trip to the podium. Is Yakupov the obvious choice or might Galchenyuk get the call? My sense is it’s closer than many people think.


NHL Central Scouting: No. 4 among North American skaters

The Hockey News: No. 7

International Scouting Services: No. 16

McKeen’s Hockey: No. 2

Red Line Report: No. 6

TSN: No. 4


A knee injury suffered in a 2011-12 OHL preseason game limited Galchenyuk to all but the last two regular season games and six games playoff games — he recorded four points (2-2-4) during Sarnia’s first round loss to Saginaw.

In 2010-11, Galchenyuk finished second among Ontario Hockey League rookies with 83 points (31-52-83), behind only his teammate and good friend Nail Yakupov (49-52-101).

He was the fourth U.S.-born player to be selected first overall in the OHL priority draft (2010), joining Pat Peake (1990), Patrick O’Sullivan (2001) and Rob Schremp (2002).

Prior to being drafted, Galchenyuk competed for the Chicago Young Americans of the Midwest Elite League for the 2009-10 season — he led the league in scoring (by 33 points) totaling 87 points (44-43-87) in 38 games.


David O’Connor, NHLDraft.com

"Galchenyuk is a big, play-making center who can skate very well, especially for his size. He has outstanding vision, hockey sense and is a great passer. He’s always very aware of where everyone is and will be on the ice, and he uses that to his advantage.

"Galchenyuk uses his big body well to create space for himself in the slot and on the boards. He has a very underrated shot, exceptional release and is very accurate. He can not only produce offensively night-in night-out, but he’s also very good defensively and understands that taking care of things in his own end is as important as producing at the other end of the ice. He also has outstanding hands and can often be found stick-handling in phone booths."


Scouting Report: "He’s an intense and highly skilled big centre. He’s not going to bang you off the puck, but he’ll use leverage. He’s high-end."

Projection: "A tremendous No. 2 centre."

Weaknesses: "He has to add come consistency to his game. His problem is he missed so much of the year with his injury. He’s missed some development time, so we haven’t seen all of the package yet."

NHL Comparable: "Well, who’s a great second-line NHL centre? He’s not really like a Jordan Staal. He kind of reminds of (winger) Milan Hejduk, actually. In tight, he’s pretty quick."

Listen to Robin Brownlee Wednesdays and Thursdays from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. on the Jason Gregor Show on TEAM 1260.

  • derrickhands

    I would take Galchenyuk over Yakupov no questions asked. There is more of a need for the 2nd C then most people realize. Last year other teams were keying on RNH and the top line, with another good center this would relieve the pressure. Galchenyuk is closer to 6’2″ and likes the psychical game which the Oilers need and he would create the room for his wingers to play. It could of been Yakupov’s injuries, but some say Galchenyuk was the superior player in the play-offs this year and he wasn’t really in game shape yet.

  • derrickhands

    Getzlaf, good player, but I am not sure he’s the same player he was before his injury last year.
    I would sooner waste a Hemsky or Gagner on someone like Staal from Pitts.

  • Getzlaf has won at every level,he dominates in the faceoffs,he is tough as nails and would teach the kids how to win.The guy is a prairie boy and im sure would not have a problem playing in Edmonton.The fact he is a UFA in a year might mean the ducks would trade him now rather than lose him in a year.

  • derrickhands

    Good points Arch

    However I think that while Galchenyuk might not be Richards he has a much better chance of being like Kopitar than Gagner does. It doesn’t move the team forward much and is risky to trade a centre to draft a centre even if he’s somewhat better in the end.

    But what about other assets? One of the D prospects and the best 2nd in the draft, plus? Having RHN Gagner Galchenyuk could be pretty nice. Especially if Schultz can be landed to offset the D prospect.

    And then when things go haywire and the team tanks again, add MacKinnon to the fold and look out. At least until they have to be traded because of the cap.