Monday Mailbag – December 1st

Can you believe it’s already December? Even stranger, can you believe that the Oilers still don’t have a win against the Western Conference? It’s insane, but that’s a matter for another day. Today, we take a look at the questions you’ve sent in for our panel of writers. If you have a question, you can email it to me at baggedmilk@oilersnation.com or hit me up on Twitter at @jsbmbaggedmilk. I’ll try to get your question as soon as I can. With that, here’s another edition of the mailbag.

I take them at face value. Everybody has to be accountable.

Obviously he’s a competitive guy who’s frustrated with what’s happening this year (and I’m sure with the continuation from last year). I mean, look how angry the fans get with the amount of ice time and the never ending leash Justin Schultz is getting. Can you imagine being a teammate? Having the coach (presumably) say one thing, but then do the opposite? I guarantee everyone in that room is far more frustrated with what happens on the ice than any fan could ever be, and I’m actually surprised more guys haven’t started venting to the media more.

I think it was a challenge to players like Justin Schultz. He saw the same mistakes over and over with no remorse or learning and he called out him teammates. If you watch the whole thing he does everything but name Schultz. It’s no coincidence that not long after that Justin Schultz got benched in the Dallas Game.

He’s frustrated at his teammates, and he should be. The Oilers are fighting for their lives and some of these gents can’t be bothered to check or get to the bench. Maybe they should read through Oilers history and have a look at how many NHL careers have ended with this team. Anyone remember Robert Nilsson? Didn’t think so.

Nothing wrong with speaking the truth. We all see that the Oilers are making major errors in the game and often beating themselves. I have no issue with it at all.

He is right. Everyone is thinking it. I am sure the coaches have said it in the room many times.

I’m glad somebody said it!  I loved seeing how pissed off Perron was when he called everyone out.  It’s nice to see some passion on a team that’s sorely lacking in that department.  The stupid thing was that Perron’s name started coming up in trade rumours almost immediately after this. The Oilers need MORE DP – not less.

No I don’t. Trading from the position of weakness the Oilers are in is bad enough when you make a move of any kind because you don’t get full value. Trading one of your best bargaining chips is worse. It’s more likely the Oilers will trade somebody like Perron — talk now is about Anisimov — to get a usable player. Oilers need an NHL centre. Not an elite NHL centre but somebody who can take second-line minutes. You don’t give up Hall, Eberle or RNH for that.

The Oilers are between a rock and a hard place right now. No matter who they trade away they’re going to get less than fair value because everyone and their dog knows they’re dealing from a position of weakness. They desperately need to fill multiple holes and any GM worth his salt would try to take as much advantage of that as he could. And as much as it pains me to say it I think Eberle is the odd man out here. He’s an amazing complimentary player but he’s not quite at the level of Nuge or Hall, and I believe that Yak just has way too much potential and has made great strides in just two seasons that he’s going to burst through the stratosphere any day, and you’d be insane to trade him. 

As I said they’re going to get fleeced in basically any trade they try to make during the season, so I don’t know if we’ll see a trade any time soon, for better or worse.

If it isn’t time then it’s close to it. The core member I trade is Jordan Eberle because he has the most value among players not named RNH and Hall. Jordan Eberle can net you something very good. Wait, is Justin Schultz part of the core? If he’s part of the core then I might change my answer. 

It depends on the return, but yes I think it’s likely time. I would nominate Justin Schultz, and do wonder if they’re going to be forced to cut bait on Nail Yakupov as well.

Schultz would be first to go for me.

It depends on who is your core. I don’t move 4,93,14 or 29. 

I would never say never.  It all depends what would be coming back the other way. Put it this way: if the Oilers truly want to trade for a top centre or defenceman they may have to trade a guy like Eberle.  I’m not saying it’s right, but it would have to happen.  It’s one of those chicken and the egg situations. We want to trade for great players, but we don’t want to give up solid assets to get one.

I start with Kevin Lowe. Not because firing him will make any difference to the on-ice product today or tomorrow, but because it signals a real change and gives somebody from outside the organization the rest of this season to assess the performance of Craig MacTavish and everybody under him. Based on that assessment, changes follow. Bob Nicholson could oversee the interview process for a new POHO and act in that position until its filled.

#FireTheMall 

Obviously the first order of business is to fire Kevin Lowe. I don’t think it will magically turn this team around like an alarming amount of people seem to, but he’s been at the helm of this sinking ship since 2000. 2000!!!!!! That is insane!!! The guy has had a job for 15 years and has done NOTHING in that time! 

And I’m not wise enough to have any suggestions about who could replace him. I’m sure one of the 1500 assistant GMs in Detroit or something that could fill the role admirably. And then I’d let that person decide on whether or not to keep MacT (I wouldn’t fire him yet) and go from there. 

The biggest change to the front office I would make is that moving forward any openings wouldn’t be filled by anyone but the best. I have no beef with MacT as GM and I’m not convinced Kevin Lowe is pulling strings. If Kevin Lowe wants to step down then I’d let him, but Nicholson runs the OEG and MacT runs the Oilers. Maybe the one guy I would can is whichever person is responsible for knowing the CBA inside and out. I’m still chapped about Tkachev.

Well, I’d fire whoever didn’t know about the Vladimir Tkachev contract situation and I’d fire the pro scouts. I would do more but don’t think turning over an entire staff in one week is realistic. 

One week won’t change all the issues within this organization. I don’t have names, because I would actually interview multiple people for jobs rather than just promote from within or people I knew. That is the problem with firing people mid season: your replacement options are limited. I would want to be the owner for two months in the off season and have time to properly interview people and go through the process of hiring a President, GM and coach if all three were necessary.

God created the world in 7 days but to turn the Oilers around will take more time. I wouldn’t take the job unless I got to be in charge for a long time. So keep your one week.

I’d put a system in place whereas management actually has to endure a job interview before being handed the keys to the franchise. That’s all I want – a little bit of due process.

It makes more sense to me to start as the top, as I said in the question previous to this one. Find a new POHO. He hires a new GM, if that’s the call that’s made. The new GM hires the coach he wants. The new coach hires the assistants he wants. What good does it do to fire Eakins now so the players can spend the rest of this season under a new coach if that new coach isn’t around to start next season because the new POHO or GM doesn’t want him?

I still think it is valid, but this is a giant hole Steve Tambellini has put the Oilers in that MacT now has to try to dig them out from. If either one of Renney or Kreuger had gotten 2 or 3 seasons, and the team was still this bad, then I’d probably be more on board with looking into a new coach. But obviously the coaching carousel hasn’t done any good for anyone. I’m definitely willing to concede that Dallas Eakins may just not be the right fit for this team, and that maybe he’s just one of those guys who is better suited for the AHL. And, BOY, is it getting harder and harder to defend Eakins with each passing game, and each head scratching line up decision. HOWEVER, as has been said ad nauseam bringing a new coach in isn’t going to fix this team. 

I can see the merit in the argument that bringing in, say, Dan Bylsma now would be a smart idea so that at least he and the team could have 3/4 of a season to get to know each other and figure this mess out, rather than having to start from scratch at the beginning of next season, but I just don’t see it happening.

No. Now is the time you stick with the coach more than ever. The organization needs to show these players the coach isn’t the problem and if they want to start winning they have to start learning. Given the change in possession metrics I would be happy seeing Eakins into next year. Maybe give the guy a goalie though.

You may not (probably wouldn’t) get the best possible candidate if you fired Dallas Eakins now. Best to wait I think. 

What if Bylsma doesn’t want to come here? Who do you hire? Promoting Nelson just brings in another rookie NHL head coach. No thanks. If you can Eakins you likely go with Ramsay as an Interim coach and then in the off season you do an extensive search for a head coach.

Who is the new coach? The default position seems to be Bylsma. If a coaching change is needed I don’t just give it to the next guy available. I wait till after the season and do a huge search with many interviews.

I’d be more interested in seeing what Dallas Eakins can do with some actual NHL players filling up his roster.  I know it’s a popular opinion around here that another coach will be the answer, but I don’t think that’s the case.  It’s not Dallas Eakins’ fault that he went into this season with 2 NHL centreman, and a plethora of 3rd pairing defenceman.  Craig MacTavish has to do a better of job of putting his coach in a position to succeed, and that means giving him better players.  Personally, I’m not convinced Scotty Bowman himself would be able to turn this thing around.

Easiest to write about a great team. You can break up the grind of day-to-day results, game stories and practice pieces with features that are fun. Readers like that and writers like that. When a team’s in the crapper like the Oilers are, it’s kind of difficult to pull a player aside and do something goofy or fun — unless you’re Gene Principe. Nobody wants to talk about their “best minor hockey memories” or “who does the cooking at our bachelor pad” when the team has lost 101 straight games.

For me, personally, I find it easier to write when they’re terrible. I’m not good with stats or breaking games down to point out why a team did or did not win, but I’m GREAT at making terrible puns and droning on and on about how dumb it is for Luke Gazdic to get praise for his play during the second intermission of a game in which he played ONE shift in a period. 

I wouldn’t know! I’ve only ever written about a terrible team. My guess is that we have a LOT more to talk about though. 

I like to watch teams being built, so in theory this is my favorite time to observe and write about a team. However, there’s plenty to write about in OKC and the draft, so I’ll happily spend more time there if that’s where the season takes us.

They all have different angles and challenges. It gets tedious always writing about what is wrong with a team. Eventually it would be nice to write about “this move could push them over the top” rather than “this move will cure their woes” because we know the latter is never fixed with one move. It would be a wonderful change of pace to pen words about a competitive hockey team. I can tell you that writing articles on the Eskimos and Rush the past year were a breath of fresh air. But I wouldn’t say one is easier or harder, they are just different. It is nice to write positive things sometimes. Always focusing on the negative gets tiresome.

Yes. Who likes to be negative most of the time? I would rather talk about tweaks to a lineup rather than changing a bunch of things.

I wish I could tell you what it’s like to write about a good hockey team.  When that happens, I’ll let you know what I prefer.  Unless you guys want me to start covering the Blackhawks or something.