logo

Monday Mailbag – Fixing goal reviews

alt
Photo credit:Tom Kostiuk
baggedmilk
6 years ago
Can you believe it’s been a week since the last mailbag? I guess time flies when you’re banging your head against the wall, trying to figure out what the hell is going on with this hockey team. As always, you’ve submitted your questions and I’ve sent them off to our panel of mental warlords for their thoughts and ideas. If you have a question for the Mailbag, you can always hit me up through email or on Twitter. Until then, enjoy the free learning opportunity.
1) Al asks – Still frustrated and bewildered over the goalie interference call vs. Calgary (not to mention Minnesota & Koivu even). But my question is re: McDavid and “abuse of officials.” I loved his passion and his fire in the emotion of the game. However, do teams/players ever worry about refs holding a grudge? They’re professionals, but humans. Do teams run analytics on refs and their tendencies to make certain calls at certain times on certain plays? Do teams watch out for certain refs? Will refs, not in an obvious way like with Auger and Burrows, but subtle way make a call/non-call against a player?
Robin Brownlee:
Referees have memories. It’s human nature. The best ones do everything they can not to let that get in the way, but if every interaction with a given player involves him calling you a ^$&@@@ and  #@##^#%, there’s going to be a problem getting a square call. There are running beefs between coaches/players and referees that last years.
Jason Gregor:
I’ve asked about teams scouting officials before, but I’ve never got an answer saying they watch out for one. Every organization at different times feels an official is bias against them, but I’m not sure there is any proof an official does. I don’t think Kendrick Nicholson and Steve Kozari had any vendetta against McDavid or the Oilers, at least I’ve never seen games where they have, I just think they had a terrible night. Handing out misconducts like candy at halloween showed me they let their ego get best of them. I’d hope they’d be better next time.
Matt Henderson:
There are websites that scout officials with some basic information that is pretty interesting. If teams AREN’T putting effort into that kind of research then it’s a wasted opportunity. It would be good to know what’s going on with these refs — who you can push and see better calls from later, who you cannot.
Christian Pagnani:
I think there was something with the Flames after the Dennis Wideman incident, but otherwise I doubt there’s much going on.
I’m sure they have biases and favour certain players. A player like Patrick Maroon isn’t going to get the benefit of the doubt like Jonathan Toews or Ryan Getzlaf would.
Chris the Intern:
I don’t think it’s as serious as deeply analyzing every official before every game, but I’ve read interviews from retired referees about them holding grudges against players. I think it’s pretty common. HOWEVER, that goes for mostly shit-disturbers around the league. I’m pretty sure McDavid’s comments won’t have any long term affects on him with any other future referees… I hope so anyways.
Baggedmilk:
Refs will always remember if a guy cuts them down because they’re human beings, but the guys that did the Oilers/Flames game last Thursday were butter soft. Kassian got weak calls against him and they also had hurt little feelings about Connor, so we’ll see if that makes refs hate the Olers even more than they do now.
2) Steve in Winnipeg asks – The NHL has really bunged up some of their goal review calls this season and I’m wondering how you think they can fix it?
Robin Brownlee:
Fans protest the loudest when one of those calls goes against their team. They look the other way when their team gets a break. That said, in a perfect world I think the best way to approach something like goaltender interference is to leave it to the discretion of the referee. The problem is that too many referees aren’t showing they have the ability to make common sense calls and there’s a huge disparity in what is and isn’t a goal — the Kesler play last spring compared to the McDavid call against Calgary for example. I also have an issue with referees who tend to think that any contact with a goaltender constitutes interference. In the course of a play it can happen. Does the goaltender have a chance to re-set after being contacted or is he knocked right out of position etc etc? I think there should have to be profound and undeniable evidence that the referee has missed something to overturn the call of a good goal.
Jason Gregor:
Good question. They could start by having a semblance of consistency. I’d recommend having a former official in the situation room, which recently should be called the Shituation room or Create a Situation room. At least a former official would have more experience. I can accept human error in games. I don’t expect refs/linesmen to make the right call all the time, because we are talking split-second decisions, but the video review takes five minutes. They watch it over and over and still get it wrong. It is a joke.
Matt Henderson:
No review should ever be allowed to go in slow motion EXCEPT when determining if a goal crossed the line. Anything else, like offside or interference, should be real-time only. Offside should be a plane (like the goal line) and not require both feet on the ice. Goalie interference has to actually impede the goalie.
Christian Pagnani:
They need to make it clearer. Truthfully, I didn’t think the call against McDavid in overtime was that bad. He makes contacts with Rittich and that impacts the play. People just get upset when similar plays are called differently.
Chris the Intern:
I don’t know man, no matter what you do, there’s always going to be a problem with the goaltender interference review process. I say you remove the challenge portion all together. If the referee doesn’t see it happen in real time, then the call on the ice stands. Pretty soon people will want coaches reviews for a slash that happened behind the play or something..
Baggedmilk:
All I know is that if I’m a goalie I’m flopping anytime someone comes anywhere near me. I mean, why not? If plays are going to be reviewed and goals are going to get called back for even the tiniest touch, then why not yard sale whenever an opposing player is in the crease? It’s ridiculous. I don’t have an answer for how to fix it because the NHL will probably do the opposite and continue to shoot themselves in the foot.
Oct 9, 2017; Edmonton, Alberta, CAN; Edmonton Oilers left wing Milan Lucic (27) during the face off against the Winnipeg Jets during the third period at Rogers Place. Winnipeg Jets won 5-2. Mandatory Credit: Sergei Belski-USA TODAY Sports
3) Vetinari asks – A recent TSN article entitled “The Death of Heavy Hockey” says that in 2018, the teams built on the old LA Kings model of using big, heavy but slow players concentrating on puck separation and retrieval is outdated and are getting skinned by the light, agile and fast teams who can control puck possession and use the Oilers as the poster boys for following the old Kings template resulting in their current woes.  Do you agree?  If so, what is the way out from here? 
Robin Brownlee:
Teams need the right mix of size and speed. For me, big players who aren’t at least average skaters are a liability unless they are smart of enough to make up for lack of foot speed by saving steps with their brain.
Jason Gregor:
Who is heavy and slow on the Oilers? Maroon, and Lucic, although he isn’t as slow as people think. Letestu isn’t fast but he isn’t big. The Oilers woes aren’t at 5×5, where you assume lack of speed would come into play. They are getting killed on special teams and Maroon and Lucic aren’t on the PK, so I don’t necessarily agree with TSN’s assessment the Oilers are loaded with big, slow players. I agree the game is getting faster, no question, but big players on the Oilers like Nurse, Kassian, Puljujarvi aren’t slow at all.
Matt Henderson:
We could go back in time and convince Chiarelli that trading skill for size is a bad idea. The NHL is a fast league and only getting faster. McDavid alone is forcing Western teams to adopt better strategies. Edmonton is going to get beat by teams just trying to keep up with Edmonton.
Christian Pagnani:
I agree. Three of their top six aren’t good skaters (Lucic, Maroon, Strome). Those players still have value, but the Oilers have too many of them and it’s made them slower. I’d move on from Maroon and Strome and try to find players who skate well, with one of them being a penalty killer. Lucic’s contract is tough so he’s here for the long haul.
Their defence skates well enough but lacks puck-movers.
Focus on adding speed and skill and worrying about size and grit less. Your best player might be one of the fastest plays ever. Utilize that.
Chris the Intern:
I do agree, and the Penguins’ dynasty the last few years is proof of this. However, it’s not to say that the speed factor in the NHL will remain the same forever. I’m looking forward to seeing what other type of team becomes successful in the NHL. I doubt this speed thing will last forever.
Baggedmilk:
I don’t think big and heavy is the problem. I think the continuous downgrade in skill is the problem. If you keep trading Lambos for little red wagons then things are going to fall apart. The problem isn’t the size, it’s that the players coming in aren’t nearly as good as the ones going out.
4) Play Dirty asks – Given the success of the Golden Knights in their inaugural season, which may have been at the expense of some existing teams, do you see the NHL changing the rules for the “Seattle” expansion draft? Do you think teams will change their approach to their own protected lists?
Robin Brownlee:
Why change it? Who wants to see an expansion team come in and suck for three or four years because they get nothing upon entering the league? Success right out of the gate look like a good marketing tool to me. Vegas is one of the best stories, maybe the best story, in the NHL this season.
Jason Gregor:
I don’t see them changing it. But teams should plan better before the next expansion draft. The point was to make the expansion team more competitive. No one expected the VGK to be this good, but let’s see if it continues next year or if it was just an incredible first season where they have ridden the wave or momentum and emotion from October.
Matt Henderson:
Yeah. There might be some tweaking of rules. That said, maybe they just need to have a rule in place that prevents Dale Tallon from dealing with Seattle.
Christian Pagnani:
Leave it how it is. Vegas being competitive out the gate must be huge for the market and the fans. How many fans would be there if they were like most expansion teams?
Teams might be more willing to just let one good player go next time instead of making side deals involving draft picks.
Chris the Intern:
I’d say no. Doesn’t make sense for the NHL to make the expansion teams less successful. This Vegas team is entertainment for the whole league, and I say good on em!
Baggedmilk:
Can’t see why the NHL would change the rules of expansion given how good Vegas has been. My bigger concern is how the hell the Oilers are going to build a protected list.
Dec 18, 2017; Edmonton, Alberta, CAN; The Edmonton Oilers celebrate a second period goal by forward Drake Caggiula (91) against the San Jose Sharks at Rogers Place. Mandatory Credit: Perry Nelson-USA TODAY Sports
5) Dale asks – The Oilers just came off their bye week, played three games, and are going back on another break for another week. What do you think of the way the schedule was laid out? Do you have any suggestions for improvement?
Robin Brownlee:
I would rather see one longer break, but some players will tell you they don’t want to be off the ice too long mid-season.
Jason Gregor:
Many teams had a similar schedule with bye week and then AS break. The Oilers are a bit different because they have two extra days after the AS break and don’t start until Thursday. But it would make more sense to have the bye weeks at a different time rather than two weeks before the AS break where teams get four days off (excluding the stars going to the game). Why not just have the bye weeks around Christmas? Players, refs, arena staff, etc could spend more time between Xmas and New Years with family and it would give players a break a month apart rather than within two weeks.
Matt Henderson:
I hate the Oilers schedule — way too many afternoon games. That alone is enough to make me dislike this thing. Also, not nearly enough Saturday games. Oh, and the Oilers didn’t play Anaheim (after a heated playoff series) for months? Who made this thing?
As far as the time off goes, I don’t really care though.
Christian Pagnani:
It’s weird. I’m not sure they need so many breaks in the schedule.
Chris the Intern:
If we were in a tough playoff race right now I’d probably be upset about it. But if anything the time off is probably best for players to rest up. This is the time of year where if you’re not in tip top shape, injuries could occur more frequently when guys get tired out. The breaks might be good to keep everyone healthy.
Baggedmilk:
Yeah, I thought it was weird to have this many breaks too. I would be more annoyed if the Oilers were rolling, but since they’re not I’m enjoying the time off.

THE MAILBAG IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY LEXUS SOUTH POINTE

Lexus South Pointe is the official automotive partner of Oilersnation. As citizens of the Nation, you receive exclusive discounts & perks no matter what you drive!
Our state-of-the-art facility also includes a virtual golf simulator, spa, and rooftop patio. Find us on the corner of Ellerslie and Gateway for all your vehicle needs. Check us out on our website here.

Check out these posts...