Don’t trade Hendricks or Gordon
By Jason Gregor
9 years agoThe trade deadline is 31 days away, and I’m stunned by how many people believe trading Matt Hendricks and Boyd Gordon would be a good decision.
Have you not being paying attention to the woes of the Oilers the past five years? You can’t win with an abundance of young players.
The Oilers do not need to stockpile more draft picks at the expense of two proven NHL veterans who are under contract for next season.
Gordon and Hendricks have faced a steady diet of D zone starts all season. They have respectively started a measly 18 and 17% of their shifts in the offensive zone. The next lowest of any forward who hasn’t played on their line is Anton Lander at 45%.
Hendricks and Gordon face tough competition, usually start in their own zone, kill penalties and they both have six goals, which is tied for 5th on the team behind Hall, RNH, Eberle and Pouliot. They are proven veterans who know how to prepare and be competitive every night, however, some feel trading them would be a good idea.
The reasons I’ve heard/read are, “It will give the Oilers a better chance to draft higher,” and “what if a team offers a 1st rounder for Gordon, or “Hendricks is 33 and will slow down.”
Let’s look at these arguments.
The Oilers will not finish 30th even if they trade both of them. Buffalo is beyond terrible. They’ve outshot their opponents in only three of the 49 games they’ve played. They are destined to finish 30th.
So that means the Oilers will be battling for 29th to 26th. They are currently in 29th place, four points behind Carolina, five behind Arizona and nine behind New Jersey. I’d say realistically they will be jockeying with Arizona and Carolina for 27th-29th.
If they finish 29th, they have a 13.5% chance to win the lottery.
If they finish 28th, they have a 11.5% chance.
If they finish 27th, they have a 9.5% chance.
If they finish 28th, they have a 11.5% chance.
If they finish 27th, they have a 9.5% chance.
You want to trade one or both of your best defensive forwards for a 4% better chance to get Connor McDavid? That is a loser bet. If you don’t win the lottery, then you don’t have McDavid or Gordon and Hendricks and the team will be just as bad again next season.
I realize there has been a lot of hype around Jack Eichel, but the more scouts I speak with, the less I’m hearing that he is a generational player like McDavid. They really like Eichel, but not one of the six scouts used that word to describe him. They really like him, and all have him rated #2, but none said he is a lock to build a franchise around. He could be, but it wasn’t guaranteed, where all six of them said McDavid is that special.
Again, if you feel Eichel is that valuable to trade away proven veterans for future picks, I see that as a loser mentality and if Oilers management has that philosophy then they shouldn’t be in charge. I’d like to believe they don’t.
TRADE FOR A 1ST ROUNDER
The value of a draft pick is always overrated leading into the trade deadline and at the draft. I’ve conducted many articles outlining the percentages of a draft pick becoming an NHL player, and it isn’t nearly as high as the value people attach to a pick. I’ve also read many article by other writers illustrating the exact same thing.
Would a team offer the Oilers a 1st rounder for Gordon? It is possible, considering Nashville gave up one for Paul Gaustad a few years ago, but it is very unlikely and even if the Oilers could land one, the odds of that pick becoming a player better than Gordon are still low.
Gordon was a first round pick, 17th overall in 2002. He was never an elite scorer in junior, so he wasn’t projected to be a top-six forward in the NHL, but he’s become a solid defensive forward.
If the Oilers did receive a 1st round pick, it most likely would be between #20-#30. Let’s to a quick look at recent drafts and what type of players emerge in that range. I looked at drafts from 2009-2013. I didn’t include last year, because it was too early. David Pastrnak is the only one playing, and he’s played 13 games.
2009 | |||||||||
# | Drafted By | Player | Pos | Drafted From | GP | G | A | Pts | PIM |
21 | Columbus | John Moore | D | Chicago Steel [USHL] | 201 | 7 | 26 | 33 | 52 |
22 | Vancouver | Jordan Schroeder | C | U. of Minnesota [WCHA] | 59 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 8 |
23 | Calgary | Tim Erixon | D | Skelleftea AIK [SEL] | 76 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 30 |
24 | Washington | Marcus Johansson | C | Farjestads Farlstad [SEL] | 311 | 54 | 114 | 168 | 30 |
25 | Boston | Jordan Caron | R | Rimouski Oceanic [QMJHL] | 129 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 67 |
26 | Anaheim | Kyle Palmieri | R | U.S. Under-18 Team [Ind] | 166 | 39 | 37 | 76 | 82 |
27 | Carolina | Philippe Paradis | L | Shawinigan [QMJHL] | |||||
28 | Chicago | Dylan Olsen | D | Camrose Kodiaks [AJHL] | 116 | 5 | 16 | 21 | 34 |
29 | Tampa Bay | Carter Ashton | R | Lethbridge Canes [WHL] | 54 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 32 |
30 | Pittsburgh | Simon Despres | D | Saint John [QMJHL] | 130 | 4 | 24 | 28 | 114 |
2010 | |||||||||
# | Drafted By | Player | Pos | Drafted From | GP | G | A | Pts | PIM |
20 | Pittsburgh | Beau Bennett | R | Penticton Vees [BCHL] | 66 | 9 | 20 | 29 | 10 |
21 | Detroit | Riley Sheahan | C | Notre Dame [CCHA] | 93 | 17 | 30 | 47 | 18 |
22 | Montreal | Jarred Tinordi | D | U.S. National Development Team [USHL] | 39 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 49 |
23 | Buffalo | Mark Pysyk | D | Edmonton Oil Kings [WHL] | 67 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 16 |
24 | Chicago | Kevin Hayes | C | Nobles School [Mass.] | 43 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 14 |
25 | Florida | Quinton Howden | L | Moose Jaw Warriors [WHL] | 34 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
26 | Washington | Evgeny Kuznetsov | C | Chelyabinsk Traktor [KHL] | 63 | 8 | 19 | 27 | 18 |
27 | Phoenix | Mark Visentin | G | Niagara IceDogs [OHL] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28 | San Jose | Charlie Coyle | R | South Shore Kings [EJHL] | 155 | 26 | 38 | 64 | 89 |
29 | Anaheim | Emerson Etem | C | Medicine Hat Tigers [WHL] | 94 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 17 |
30 | NY Islanders | Brock Nelson | C | Warroad H.S. [Minn.] | 121 | 29 | 28 | 57 | 30 |
2011 | |||||||||
# | Drafted By | Player | Pos | Drafted From | GP | G | A | Pts | PIM |
20 | Phoenix | Connor Murphy | D | U.S. National Devel [USHL] | 73 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 29 |
21 | Ottawa | Stefan Noesen | R | Plymouth Whalers [OHL] | |||||
22 | Toronto | Tyler Biggs | R | U.S. National Devel [USHL] | |||||
23 | Pittsburgh | Joe Morrow | D | Portland WHWKs[WHL] | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
24 | Ottawa | Matt Puempel | L | Peterborough Petes [OHL] | |||||
25 | Toronto | Stuart Percy | D | Mississauga [OHL] | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
26 | Chicago | Phillip Danault | C | Victoriaville Tigres [QMJHL] | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
27 | Tampa Bay | Vladislav Namestnikov | C | London Knights [OHL] | 30 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
28 | Minnesota | Zack Phillips | C | Saint John Sea Dogs [QMJ) | |||||
29 | Vancouver | Nicklas Jensen | R | Oshawa Generals [OHL] | 24 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
30 | Anaheim | Rickard Rakell | C | Plymouth Whalers [OHL] | 60 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 10 |
2012 | |||||||||
# | Drafted By | Player | Pos | Drafted From | GP | G | A | Pts | PIM |
20 | Philadelphia | Scott Laughton | L | Oshawa Generals [OHL] | 32 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
21 | Calgary | Mark Jankowski | C | Stanstead College (Quebec) | |||||
22 | Pittsburgh | Olli Maatta | D | London Knights [OHL] | 98 | 10 | 28 | 38 | 24 |
23 | Florida | Michael Matheson | D | Dubuque Saints [USHL] | |||||
24 | Boston | Malcolm Subban | G | Belleville Bulls [OHL] | |||||
25 | St. Louis | Jordan Schmaltz | D | GreenBay Gamblers [USHL] | |||||
26 | Vancouver | Brendan Gaunce | C | Belleville Bulls [OHL] | |||||
27 | Phoenix | Henrik Samuelsson | C | Edmonton Oil Kings [WHL] | |||||
28 | NY Rangers | Brady Skjei | D | U.S. National Devel[USHL] | |||||
29 | New Jersey | Stefan Matteau | F | U.S. National Devel[USHL] | 17 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
30 | Los Angeles | Tanner Pearson | L | Barrie Colts [OHL] | 67 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 22 |
2013 | |||||||||
Drafted By | Player | Pos | Drafted From | GP | G | A | Pts | PIM | |
20 | Detroit | Anthony Mantha | R | Val d’Or Foreurs [QMJHL] | |||||
21 | Toronto | Frederik Gauthier | C | Rimouski Oceanic [QMJHL] | |||||
22 | Calgary | Emile Poirier | L | Gatineau [QMJHL] | |||||
23 | Washington | Andre Burakovsky | L | Malmo Redhawks [Swe-1] | 38 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 6 |
24 | Vancouver | Hunter Shinkaruk | L | Medicine Hat Tigers [WHL] | |||||
25 | Montreal | Michael McCarron | R | U.S. National Devel [USHL] | |||||
26 | Anaheim | Shea Theodore | D | Seattle Thunderbirds [WHL] | |||||
27 | Columbus | Marko Dano | C | Bratislava Slovan [KHL] | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
28 | Calgary | Morgan Klimchuk | L | Regina Pats [WHL] | |||||
29 | Dallas | Jason Dickinson | C | Guelph Storm [OHL] | |||||
30 | Chicago | Ryan Hartman | R | Plymouth Whalers [OHL] |
We can all agree the pick wouldn’t help the Oilers next season, and they likely wouldn’t see any reward for at least three seasons.
Brock Nelson is starting to emerge as a solid player, but he was drafted in 2010, so even if they got a player similar to Nelson he wouldn’t be impacting the Oilers until 2019. Teams have found gems in that range, but it isn’t as often as many think.
The continual hope for the future mentality needs to stop in Edmonton. The organization needs to realize you can’t win with all young players. Having a veteran like Derek Roy is better than a Marc Arcobello and a five year pro like Lander is better today than a rookie like Draisaitl.
HENDRICKS IS OLD
This line was trotted out when he was acquired last year. His contract is too much, many analytics guys argued, and his play would fall off. Hendricks has been in the NHL for one more season than Taylor Hall. Yes he is 33, but he doesn’t have that many NHL miles on his odometer. He played NCAA and then spent five years in the minors developing his game. He had to work for everything he had. I doubt he magically slows down next season.
He is also the vocal leader in the room. He has challenged the young players to take hold of the team and become a leader. He’s done it in a positive way, but the Oilers don’t have many vocal leaders and his value is more than just his solid play on the ice.
Trading him for a mid-round pick would be a move made by a losing organization.
The Oilers should not be thinking about dealing Hendricks or Gordon for a draft pick. Making a deal to move them would simply be starting up another round of a rebuild.
I’d hope the Oilers and their fans are sick of the continual cycle of rebuilding that we’ve witnessed for the past six-nine seasons.
PARTING SHOTS
- Just to clarify, the only reason trading Jeff Petry makes sense is because he is a UFA and it is better to get something for him now than lose him for nothing this summer. Lander is succeeding in the NHL now because he is finally ready for the NHL. He is not making some magical re-birth. He never should have been in the NHL at 20. He wasn’t ready and the Oilers had five other skilled forwards who were 22 and under: Gagner (22), Eberle (21), Paajarvi (20), Hall (19) and RNH (18). It was pure lunacy to have him here, so if you want to point blame at his lack of production in his first few seasons direct it at the organization.
Lander is proof that time in the minors helps the majority of players. Even when he was 21 he was still learning how to play the North American game in the AHL. He got comfortable last season and tallied 83 points in 75 games in OKC. But he still wasn’t NHL-ready until this year.
I’m not expecting Lander to emerge as an elite scorer, but he is becoming the player Stu MacGregor drafted in 2009. He works hard, he is a solid leader, been captain in OKC, and he has decent offensive instincts.
It took Lander five years to properly develop, which is what the data suggest for draft picks outside the first round.
He is a perfect example of why there is nothing wrong with playing Martin Marincin in OKC this season.
Let him continue to develop.
Recently by Jason Gregor:
Recent articles from Jason Gregor