<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/Image/Craig MacTavish3.png" width="600" height="343" alt="" />
Yesterday, Craig MacTavish spoke to the media about the Edmonton Oilers&rsquo; performance. Among other items, he made it clear that he still has confidence in head coach Dallas Eakins.

After uttering similar lines during his availability and stressing the need for stability behind the bench, MacTavish told Bob Stauffer of Oilers Now that he &ldquo;really couldn&rsquo;t be happier with the coaching.&rdquo;
<h1>The Vote of Confidence</h1>
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/Image/40-Dubnyk-10.png" width="600" height="359" alt="" />
The interesting thing about the managerial vote of confidence is that it often seems to precede the firing of said coach in short order. There are, I think, a couple of reasons for that.
The biggest is that managers don&rsquo;t have to give coaches with good records a vote of confidence. Reporters don&rsquo;t generally ask whether guys like Jon Cooper or Joel Quenneville are going to get fired; it&rsquo;s obvious that they&rsquo;re safe. Columnists don&rsquo;t speculate on the safety of Todd McLellan or Dan Bylsma, at least not when those teams are winning, because there&rsquo;s no question that the results support their continued employment.
So by the time the manager is in a position to opine on his head coach, there&rsquo;s something in the record that suggests said head coach should be fired. And as a general rule, the media will always be ready to fire the coach before management is, which means that even when the coach is going to be fired there&rsquo;s often a period of time when the media thinks he could be and the manager wants to hang on a little longer to see if the coach can turn things around.
The other reason is a simple trick of memory: we tend to remember the contradicition of a general manager supporting his coach and then firing him a week or two later, while we don&#8217;t necessarily remember the close call that turned out okay.
<h1>Eakins</h1>
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/Image/Dallas Eakins 7.png" width="600" height="344" alt="" />
The thing keeping Dallas Eakins safe right now isn&rsquo;t necessarily Craig MacTavish&rsquo;s public statement, and it certainly isn&rsquo;t the record or the underlying performance of his team (both of which are awful at the moment). It&rsquo;s history.
Too many coaches in Edmonton have fallen by the wayside. The traditional point of reference is Sam Gagner; he&rsquo;s just started his seventh season with the Oilers and he&rsquo;s on his fifth head coach. It&#8217;s ridiculous.&nbsp;
There has been too much turnover, and other things need to change before the coaching does.

<img src="https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/Image/Craig MacTavish3.png" width="600" height="343" alt="" />
Yesterday, Craig MacTavish spoke to the media about the Edmonton Oilers&rsquo; performance. Among other items, he made it clear that he still has confidence in head coach Dallas Eakins.

After uttering similar lines during his availability and stressing the need for stability behind the bench, MacTavish told Bob Stauffer of Oilers Now that he &ldquo;really couldn&rsquo;t be happier with the coaching.&rdquo;
<h1>The Vote of Confidence</h1>
<img src="https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/Image/40-Dubnyk-10.png" width="600" height="359" alt="" />
The interesting thing about the managerial vote of confidence is that it often seems to precede the firing of said coach in short order. There are, I think, a couple of reasons for that.
The biggest is that managers don&rsquo;t have to give coaches with good records a vote of confidence. Reporters don&rsquo;t generally ask whether guys like Jon Cooper or Joel Quenneville are going to get fired; it&rsquo;s obvious that they&rsquo;re safe. Columnists don&rsquo;t speculate on the safety of Todd McLellan or Dan Bylsma, at least not when those teams are winning, because there&rsquo;s no question that the results support their continued employment.
So by the time the manager is in a position to opine on his head coach, there&rsquo;s something in the record that suggests said head coach should be fired. And as a general rule, the media will always be ready to fire the coach before management is, which means that even when the coach is going to be fired there&rsquo;s often a period of time when the media thinks he could be and the manager wants to hang on a little longer to see if the coach can turn things around.
The other reason is a simple trick of memory: we tend to remember the contradicition of a general manager supporting his coach and then firing him a week or two later, while we don't necessarily remember the close call that turned out okay.
<h1>Eakins</h1>
<img src="https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/Image/Dallas Eakins 7.png" width="600" height="344" alt="" />
The thing keeping Dallas Eakins safe right now isn&rsquo;t necessarily Craig MacTavish&rsquo;s public statement, and it certainly isn&rsquo;t the record or the underlying performance of his team (both of which are awful at the moment). It&rsquo;s history.
Too many coaches in Edmonton have fallen by the wayside. The traditional point of reference is Sam Gagner; he&rsquo;s just started his seventh season with the Oilers and he&rsquo;s on his fifth head coach. It's ridiculous.&nbsp;
There has been too much turnover, and other things need to change before the coaching does.

The dreaded vote of confidence

NHL Notebook: McTavish, Byram, York, don’t elect arbiration, remain eligible for offer sheet

Edmonton Oilers forward Andrew Mangiapane

Recent articles from Jonathan Willis

Breaking News