Yes but Calgary should of scored more so their season didn't ride on the refs
Call on the play was a goal, refs looked at play long and hard and deemed that they clearly saw enough of a kicking motion to Overturn their original call. Refs don’t want to do that, so no goal is correct call.
Do I think he kicked it, yes. Should it have counted, also yes. If it had of been ruled no goal on the ice, I can see the call staying. I’m shocked it was overturned
I think the big takeaway here is the rule is dumb. We should turf it to take more of the game’s results out of ref and war room hands. I do worry that if kicking is more prevalent that it’s putting goalies and downed players in more danger, but I’m not sure how valid that is.
By definition of the rule, it was the right call but I’ve seen many similar or worse get called a goal that I’d legitimately be pissed if the flames were my team.
Better question...would it really have mattered?
Honestly I thought it should’ve counted , until I heard Coleman’s post game interview
Reverse angle convinced me. Distinct kicking motion. Surprised they called it all the same.
- He was falling to the ice and skating on one leg.
- Did Cody Ceci force Coleman’s leg in that direction?
- What even is a distant kicking motion?
Breaking News
- Tristan Jarry’s first win as an Oiler, Spencer Stastney’s debut, and a whole lotta Connor McDavid
- Oilers win Tristan Jarry’s debut over Maple Leafs 6-3: Recap, Reaction and Highlights
- An outsider’s view of the Oilers: Was Skinner that bad, Bouchard’s defensive woes exaggerated, McDavid and the cruel passage of time
- Oilers announce jersey numbers for Tristan Jarry and Spencer Stastney
- GDB 32.0: New look Oilers touch down in Toronto for a HNIC matchup with the Leafs (5pm MT, CBC)
